When You Are Planning To Compete In Industry, You Need Desktop Management

There are few types of businesses which do not use information system technology. Even for businesses like landscaping where most work is hands on, physical and outside, the business end of your company will likely use computers. They are simply to efficient at everything from scheduling, mapping, billing and communicating to overlook them as a tool for the company. When the company grows and more computers arrive at the office, the method for handling desktop management must be considered.

The term certainly sounds like an effort to get employees to adopt a clean desk approach to office work, but that would be erroneous. The goal is to create a network of computers that allow employees to interconnect and communicate to foster the synergy of group approaches to problems. The network also serves to eliminate a fair number of meetings, which tend to increasingly eat productive hours as the number of employees increase.

The advent of an internal electronic mail system alone can increase productivity dramatically, allowing employees to contact one another regardless of the time of day or geographic separation. A single mass email has the greatest probability of getting to a group of employees in the fastest possible way than any other. Once transmitted, each employee has the exact same information waiting to be retrieved at their convenience. Once initiated, email usually becomes almost a habit, with employees checking for information on a very regular basis.

One of the drawbacks to the new dependence on information technology is the cost of software and the licenses for multiple computer use. There is little a company can do as the programs need regular updating in order to stay current and to avoid security problems. The least expensive way to run a network is to have a central hub from which all the computers can be remotely cared for. There are tremendous efficiencies to gain by having an individual or small group dedicated to the care and maintenance of the company information technology system. It allows the other employees to focus on their job without the distraction of installing and updating the programs they are using to do their jobs. While individual employees may feel that it would be faster for them to install their own software, the incidence of problems arising from such a course of action reveal that is not usually the case.

Most of us have computers at home, so a relative skill level in dealing with hardware and software is a common enough ability, but so too is the realization that sometimes these supposedly self installing programs do not exactly pan out. The software makers do their best, but there are simply too many possible installation configurations for them to anticipate all of them, and sometimes they cause conflicts. The time it takes to correct these conflicts can cost a lot of man hours, and if they occur at the wrong time, they could cost much more.

This method of maintaining the information system also helps preserve the integrity of this process, which is often sabotaged by well meaning and hard working employees who mean well. Invariably employees have experimented with a wide variety of programs on their home systems, and often grow quite fond of specific capabilities. In the attempt to either use the same productivity in the office or the desire to share their favorite program, they introduce these favorite programs to the work system.

When employees introduce software from home, they risk circumventing preventive efforts by the desktop management team to keep malware out of the system. It is complicated enough to fight the constant attacks from the external world of the internet. Protecting from intrusions within the firewalls and other protective measures is difficult, costly and inefficient and a bane to the technicians working hard to keep the system running.

The age of the computer has changed business in many ways, allowing the manager unprecedented span of knowledge and control over all processes relating to his business. This has allowed for the use of data and information on an unprecedented scale. The drawback is that the available data for any business can be unwieldy and it is very possible to drown the manager in information. This is the time to leverage the power of processing to control the computer via systems management software.

 

Business has long had a need for more information. Management has always sought the answer to such questions as what will sell, when it should be sold, how can we get the product to the consumer quicker, and what inefficiencies are we experiencing. With the advent of the microprocessor, the old adage of be careful what you wish for may be an important consideration. We can now measure so many things and compile so much data that the manufacturing process becomes hard to recognize.

 

The manager is now faced with so much information about every topic that discerning the valuable information from background noise data is seriously problematic. Hiring decisions used to be made following an interview, with questions and answers and the unquantifiable interpersonal ques an interview provides. Today a successful candidate of yore may be electronically eliminated by an insignificant criterion before an interview is even conducted.

 

There is no question that the greater the quantity of valuable accurate data a business has to feed into the decision making process, the more likely a correct decision will be arrived at to the benefit of the company. The problem is knowing how much data is enough, and which data is useful. A manager needs to know what data was collected and under what conditions to understand the information from it. Trying to keep track of all the individual input through his area of operational control necessarily requires precious time sacrificed from running the business.

 

Like all tools, the computer has the potential for enhancing decisions with data that engenders confidence and produces results. It becomes problematic when the tool becomes the driving force in the business. If management is spending more time using the tool than created and delivering the goods and services at the heart of the company, there is a problem. While the information and uses for it grow exponentially, management possesses an ability to use it which remains fairly stagnant, which means there is inefficiency in the process as a whole.

 

Not surprisingly, this phenomenon is known to information system specialists, who are working feverishly to reign in the complexities of using management tools. It should also be no surprise that the solution will likely entail software designed to run or enhance the existing management tools, computers in charge of computers. This secondary iteration of control is much like the levels of management in a company, with each successive level designated to run the level below, allowing the higher levels to focus on a more strategic role.

 

Everyone who has been in business knows that it is unnecessary and counterproductive for the CEO of a major company to have to deal with every detail of daily operations. Likewise, managers need to be able to ask operational information of their management system and get the answers they need without having to personally collate the individual pieces of information necessary for their development. This is why it is essential the information be loaded into the system by all employees in a coordinated master software plan.

 

So while it is important that someone is aware of the collection and interpretation of all the detailed information a company has, there has to be a way to develop that raw data into useful knowledge for each level of management. This is the crux of systems management software, manipulating data collected by software systems to develop actionable information for leadership to run the business efficiently and profitably.